,
,
, , - 等)
2. 保留所有图片的 src 和 alt 属性
3. 只翻译标签之间的文本内容
4. 所有英文必须翻译成中文,不保留英文原文
5. 输出完整的HTML代码
HTML内容:
Authenticating test users in Playwright
If you've worked with Playwright at scale, you know that test user management is super important and a common source of flaky tests, failures, or maintenance headaches. I recently spent some time working on a Playwright project with tightly coupled project dependencies and adapted it to log in users only when necessary. Here's a little bit of that journey.
The old way
The framework was built using well-established patterns to handle test user dependencies. It had:
-
Setup "tests" (in name only) that created
storageState auth files before the real tests ran.
-
Project dependencies that called those setup tests at the start of each run.
-
User fixtures that loaded auth files into the Playwright page context for real tests to use.
-
Many test projects using a mixture of direct paths and tags to locate tests and necessary dependencies.
Here’s a simplified view of those framework components:
// the projects and their dependencies (playwright.config.ts)
export default defineConfig({
projects: [
{ name: 'setup-admin', testMatch: ['**/setup/admin.setup.ts'] },
{ name: 'setup-customer', testMatch: ['**/setup/customer.setup.ts'] },
// setup and test projects continue to grow in count over time
...
{
name: 'smoke-admin',
dependencies: ['setup-admin'],
testMatch: ['**/tests/admin/**.spec.ts'],
},
{
name: 'smoke',
dependencies: ['setup-admin', 'setup-customer'],
grep: /@smoke/,
},
],
});
<
免责声明:本文内容来自互联网,该文观点不代表本站观点。本站仅提供信息存储空间服务,不拥有所有权,不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌抄袭侵权/违法违规的内容,请到页面底部单击反馈,一经查实,本站将立刻删除。
Authenticating test users in Playwright
If you've worked with Playwright at scale, you know that test user management is super important and a common source of flaky tests, failures, or maintenance headaches. I recently spent some time working on a Playwright project with tightly coupled project dependencies and adapted it to log in users only when necessary. Here's a little bit of that journey.
The old way
The framework was built using well-established patterns to handle test user dependencies. It had:
-
Setup "tests" (in name only) that created
storageStateauth files before the real tests ran. - Project dependencies that called those setup tests at the start of each run.
- User fixtures that loaded auth files into the Playwright page context for real tests to use.
- Many test projects using a mixture of direct paths and tags to locate tests and necessary dependencies.
Here’s a simplified view of those framework components:
// the projects and their dependencies (playwright.config.ts)
export default defineConfig({
projects: [
{ name: 'setup-admin', testMatch: ['**/setup/admin.setup.ts'] },
{ name: 'setup-customer', testMatch: ['**/setup/customer.setup.ts'] },
// setup and test projects continue to grow in count over time
...
{
name: 'smoke-admin',
dependencies: ['setup-admin'],
testMatch: ['**/tests/admin/**.spec.ts'],
},
{
name: 'smoke',
dependencies: ['setup-admin', 'setup-customer'],
grep: /@smoke/,
},
],
});
<
免责声明:本文内容来自互联网,该文观点不代表本站观点。本站仅提供信息存储空间服务,不拥有所有权,不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌抄袭侵权/违法违规的内容,请到页面底部单击反馈,一经查实,本站将立刻删除。